iAudiophile.net Forums


Go Back   iAudiophile.net Forums > Cowon iAudio > Cowon & iAudio News

Post New Thread  Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-13-2012, 03:48   #1
zen-kizu
Formerly "Kizune"
 
zen-kizu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Germany, Baden-Württemberg
Posts: 5,983
Default Cowon X7 vs X9 (specs comparison)



I compared the X7's with the X9's specs list and here are the differences:

Dimensions (W x H x D, in mm): 126.9 x 78.6 x 14.5 vs 114.9 x 72.5 x 12.2 (the picture above shows both players in the right proportion)
Memory Type: HDD (120gb, 160gb) vs Flash memory (8gb, 16gb, 32gb) (X9 can't be damaged as easily as the X7, but has less memory)
microSD Slot: no vs yes
Physical Buttons: power/hold, m, vol+, vol- vs power/hold, ff, rew, play/pause, vol+, vol-
Battery Life: 103h music / 10h video vs 110h music / 13h video
Audio Output (@ 16Ω): 30mW vs 29mW
jetEffect: 3 vs 5 (more Reverb settings)
G-Sensor: no vs yes
Bluetooth: yes vs no

Everything else is the same on both players.


The "Super Player" line-up (which both the X7 and the X9 belong to) is characterized by incredible battery life, so I understand why Cowon kept the screen resolution low. But why the hell did they remove the Bluetooth module? Also, why don't they offer X9s with more internal memory?

To me the X9 looks like a very minor upgrade, to some people it's probably even a downgrade, considering there's no Bluetooth module, the internal storage is lower and the screen is very low-res.


Discussion Thread
__________________
My setup: Samsung Galaxy Note 3 + Audio Technica ATH-M50 & Shure SE215

Profiles: Google+ // deviantART // flickr

Last edited by zen-kizu; 07-13-2012 at 10:04..
zen-kizu is offline View zen-kizu's Photo Album  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Old 07-13-2012, 15:20   #2
dfkt
 
 
dfkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,975
Default



Funny enough, it's actually closer to the O2 from 2008 than to the X7 from 2011 in some aspects... same storage options (internal up to 32GB, SDHC/MicroSDHC slot), same 480x272 / 4.3" screen.

O2 supports more audio/video codecs (ALAC, TTA, MKA, etc), X9 has newer BBE enhancements (but O2 has a 10-band EQ instead of 5). X9 has obviously better battery life. Some other small differences here and there, but not that many as one would think between a player from 2008 and one from 2012. Four years have passed...
dfkt is offline View dfkt's Photo Album  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Copyright © 2006-2014 CrowdGather |  About iAudiophile |  Advertisers | Investors | Legal | Contact